|
Htay Kywe's prison release - temporary? |
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Tuesday, 04 December 2007 |
|
Source: Radio Free Asia, Burmese language Dec 3 2007 This might be an English language exclusive to Burma Confidential (but it will get out there tomorrow). We learned this from several Burmese langauge sources: Htay Kywe has been (temporarily) released in order to attend his mother's funeral today. His mother had been sick for four years. At Htay Kywe's request, he family deliberately concealed his arrest from her. It is likely that his visit to her in the hospital led to his arrest. Per Mizzima: Htay Kywe, one of the 88 generation student members, who led the September peoples' protest, was arrested after visiting his mother in Shwegonedine Special Clinic when her health deteriorated. However, fearing that his mother's health might deteriorate further, Htay Kywe requested family members not to disclose his arrest to her. Daw Mi Mi Lay died unaware about her son's detention. "Our mother was waiting for her son. Since she was terminally ill, we did not dare disclose the truth about him [Htay Kywe]. We appealed to the authorities to allow him to come to the hospital before mother died but not long after we made the request mother passed away," continued Khin San Myint.
Although his mother died from a long battle with cancer, it is appropriate to inform our readers that many other students have learned of their parents' deaths shortly after the students were taken in by the regime. It is widely referred to as "death of a broken heart". If the process for arrest, booking, charging and assigning legal counsel were transparent in Burma, this would not occur. But what has happened on each occasion is that when the parents went to inquire as to their child's condition and whereabouts, the regime has said nothing. The parents of 88 Generation Students rightly assume the worst and, believing their child to be in the process of being tortured, they cannot bear it. |
|
Saffron Revolution Resurgence - October 31, 2007 |
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Wednesday, 31 October 2007 |
|
News & Analysis: This act of defiance may seem small relative to September's events, but it should not be underestimated. Pakokku is what sparked the nationwide monk movement. From Khin Ohmar of APPPB: At about 8 am this morning on October 31, about 100 (one hundred) monks held a peaceful march in the central Burma town of Pakkoku in Magwe Division, in lines of 3 and ended the walk back at the monestary after one hour.
According to Irrawaddy News Group, the monks marched through the town's streets chanting the “Metta Sutta” (the Buddha’s words on loving kindness). Many residents bowed before the protesting monks and the march ended peacefully about one hour later. Pakokku Monks March Again By The Irrawaddy and AP October 31, 2007 Story here. |
|
Burmese, Stand Up for UN - Min Khin Kyaw |
|
Written by Min Khin Kyaw
|
|
Tuesday, 06 November 2007 |
Urgent Actions Needed Min Khin Kyaw The simple truth is the junta doesn’t appreciate the world hosting the democratic movements for Burma everywhere. And the UN effort to make a peaceful democratic society in Burma is regarded as intervention. The generals do not welcome any positive thing for Burma simply because they want to keep the throne generation after generation. (What will people like the sons of Tay Za do to Burma when they become businessmen like their father?) The junta simply hates the involvement of the UN and the international community between them and the suppressed Burmese people. Of course, they have so far expressed ‘the world to keep away from Burma’s internal affair. However, the generals have decided to agree with the world maybe because of fear of sanction from ASEAN and other regional countries if this ever becomes true. If the generals have guts to do something against the ASEAN, they would seek silence from ASEAN or they’d voluntarily walk out of the next ASEAN meeting – if they believe ASEAN would act against them. But I don’t see this will ever to happen at all as the generals need ASEAN more than ever – simply they fear of sanction from ASEAN. So far sanctions alone have been a factor to bring the generals to dialogue and negotiation. They know the world is after democracy in Burma. But they will try to get support from anyone or any country with lies or bribery by offering natural resources which wouldn’t last long anyway as the current exploitation has been so far very many different serious concerns. Yet the junta wants to show its pride and avenge the UN – at least making mockery. They’d do whatever within their capacity to agitate the international community and undermine UN efforts as they’re very famous for their stratagems. Not to renew to UN official in Burma is their latest move after denied entry to the many UN special envoys. However, they will greet UN’s officials with their grinning smiles. But certainly, the generals have not been up to the tasks expected they’d do. Clearly, the generals are just seeking ideas how to get rid of the world involvement in Burma. They know the world doesn’t believe any of their attempts in any prove how the people support them; yet they are forcing mass demonstrations. They’re doing just that to get at least the upper hand in dialogue against NLD. On the other hand, they also do the same move they did again and again - that is freeing some detainees even though there are thousands more being detained without trial. And also asking the Daw Suu to accept their preempt move. Clearly we’re not seeking Daw Suu to meet the generals but totally opposite. We also want her freed and allowed to do her works as people’s leader. We never agreed with her detention; then why should we accept her being forced to accept the generals’ unreasonable demands? Moreover, there is no explanation why Mr. Than Shwe cannot meet Mr. Gambari to start the real dialogue. Doesn’t this mean the generals are not seeing Mr. Gambari to let him achieve his mission? Instead they let him see only with the one who is supposed to meet Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi as the bridge; this is not acceptable. What the dialogue really means to the world is it is a serious meeting between the NLD and the generals – not between NLD and lower rank officials who supposed to carry messages back and forth. As long as the junta keeps doing such things, the expected dialogue wouldn’t become real serious effort. Our skepticism will be as strong as ever as there wasn’t anything trustworthiness ever came out of the junta. If the international community cannot unite, the junta will not consider that they have to seriously cooperate with the UN and start serious engagement with Burmese people. Then freeing Burmese people from current sufferings will be delayed further. No matter how the people hate the generals, no matter the soldiers want to revolve, the military cannot break easily; there will be no civil war. First any break-apart fraction will have to face the first reality of supplies: food, shelter and arms. Therefore, the unity of the international community is needed by the Burmese people more than ever and we Burmese people muse seek for this. The UN previous envoys were bluntly ridiculed. If Mr. Gambari fails, it’s the failure of the UN, ASEAN, EU and US because all of them have seeking the full cooperation of the generals. Yet, we haven’t seen this but rather the generals are ignoring Mr. Gambari’s mission. It’s clear the junta moved a preempt attack on the UN by denying visa extension to Mr. Charles Petrie. We Burmese must protest against the expelling of UN official who spoke out the truth. We must encourage any UN official to speak out the truth. We must respect this and seek to keep all kinds of their missions in Burma. Burmese in exile have supported Mr. Gambari’s mission. He has all supports and expectation from us Burmese. Not just that, he has been given support from leading ASEAN countries, China and India. But the effect of their supports hasn’t been materialized. The UN must seek transparent dialogue between two sides however. If Mr. Gambari is denied full cooperation for the dialogue, the world must protest the generals. Hence, the world must protest against expelling or denying any UN official bluntly especially amid current national crisis in Burma. The mockery of the generals should lead to the unity among the UN members to act together for the democratic change in Burma. Min Khin Kyaw
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 06 November 2007 )
|
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Saturday, 03 November 2007 |
|
|
SPDC's peculiar UN gestures: Pinheiro, Gambari & Petrie |
|
Written by DW
|
|
Friday, 02 November 2007 |
|
Recent moves by the SPDC are clearly intended to indicate to the United Nations that the generals are still in charge of Burma (Myanmar). Thus, goes the signal, SPDC will dictate the who, what, where, when, why and how of any dialogue going forward. Pinheiro - UN Human Rights Rapporteur - first visit since 2003Two weeks ago, they agreed to "allow" the UN Human Rights Rapporteur, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, to visit after a four year absence. Burma should have been a regular stop for Pinheiro. Between 2003 and 2007, Burma has seen: Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi kept under house arrest for the entire period Prisons still housing dissidents Rape and terror campaigns carried out by the junta in Eastern Burma Horrific abuses and heroin addiction throughout the country's ruby, silver and jade mines Continuing forced labor long after a 1999 decree suspending the law which allowed it to happen in the first place Continuing conscription of child soldiers for four years after the generals declared it illegal. Seriously, they have an annual conference to address this issue. Here's the October 31, 2007 update from Human Rights Watch.
All of this, not to mention the events leading up to and including the Saffron Revolution and the bloodiest crackdown since 1988. From 2003 until now, the UN Human Rights Rapporteur Pinheiro has been barred from visiting by the government responsible for the abuses. The regime has attempted first to deny and then to paint these actions(to borrow a phrase from Unocal lawyer Daniel Petrocelli, in characterizing the SPDC pipeline security troops who have terrorized Tenasserim Division since 1992) as those of "rogue" soldiers. Looking at it through recent BBC reports, you can see what SPDC is doing to the UN. I like how they refer to Nyan Win as "Burmese Foreign Minister". BBC: October 22, 2007Burmese Foreign Minister Nyan Win wrote to the UN suggesting that Mr Pinheiro could arrive before mid-November... Ibrahim Gambari is currently in India awaiting a visa.
Gambari - UN Special Envoy - Second Visit Since August Requires a Visa?
Awaiting a visa? Shouldn't Gambari have permanent permission to travel to and from Burma? Gambari's visa was ultimately approved for November 4, 2007. Petrie - UN Burma Country Chief Since 2003 - Kicked Out Then, a day before Gambari's visit, they pull this: BBC: November 3, 2007
Dramatic timing It is not clear when Mr Petrie, who began his posting in Burma in 2003, will have to leave the country. But the timing of the junta's decision, one day before Mr Gambari's visit begins, is dramatic, says the BBC's James Reynolds in the Thai capital, Bangkok. It makes his trip, one that was already looking difficult, much more difficult, says our correspondent. On 24 October, United Nations Day, (Petrie) issued a statement critical of the country's deepening economic crisis.
Clearly, the UN's chain is being yanked. |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 06 November 2007 )
|
|
|
Karen Zoya Phan: "Please Help Us" Video |
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Wednesday, 31 October 2007 |
|
Zoya Phan urges governments outside of China not to simply "pass the buck" at the UK's Conservative Conference Party 2007 Annual Meeting. She urges all countries to block business deals with the SPDC. She is, quite literally, right on the money. For more on the happenings in England, check out Burma Campaign UK. |
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 03 November 2007 )
|
|
|
Khun Sa Chases Final Dragon |
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Tuesday, 30 October 2007 |
|
|
|
|
S. 2172 - Burma Sanctions in Foreign Relations Committee |
|
Written by David Wolfberg
|
|
Monday, 22 October 2007 |
|
Senate Bill 2172
(McCain) was introduced on October 16, 2007 and was sent to the
Committee on Foreign Relations. These are the Senate members we
must contact. We must urge them to support the bill in its entirety which means:
-
Chevron will be pulled out of Burma. Currently, Chevron is
a partner with SPDC generating the regime's single largest revenue
stream.
-
Teak imports will be banned. Currently, raw logs are
banned but finished products (like the barbecue sets sold last year at
Williams-Sonoma) are not, because they are finished in a third country
(in the case of Wms-Sonoma, China).
-
Gem and mineral imports will be banned. Similar to teak,
only raw uncut gems are banned today. Under the Saffron
Revolution Support Act of 2007, we will reduce SPDC's incentive for the
ruthless exploitation of blood rubies, silver and jade.
Aside from getting Chevron out of the bloody pipeline project, these
other sanctions impact the economies of other nations doing business
with SPDC.
Now for your homework (if you are from Burma, be sure to let them know):
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 23 October 2007 )
|
|
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Friday, 19 October 2007 |
Ko Htay Kywe is a close friend of the Burma Confidential family. Friday, October 19, 2007 Ko Htay Kywe at Insein Hospital in 2004. Biography of Ko Htay Kywe: |
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 01 November 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Dept. of State Testimony - Marciel |
|
Written by Confidential
|
|
Friday, 19 October 2007 |
|
October 17, 2007 Testimony by DAS Marciel before House Foreign Affairs Committee on strategy to foster a peaceful transition to democracy in that country and an end to its 40-plus years of repressive military rule. Highlights of Marciel's testimony: -
On Oct. 15, the EU imposed sanctions banning the export of logging and mining equipment to Burma, barring the import from Burma of such products, and prohibiting investment in these sectors in Burma. -
ASEAN criticized the regime calling for restraint and urging political reforms three weeks ago. State Dept. is pushing key members to press the regime directly, to support the Gambari mission, and to take a hard look at economic measures they can take. We have urged the Government of Japan to review its assistance to Burma to ensure that it does not benefit the regime, and it is considering doing so. We appreciate Japan’s recent public calls for restraint and public support for the UN Security Council’s October 11 Presidential Statement. (I believe there's an update today in Bush's statement). -
India’s public posture with respect to Burma has improved over the past few weeks, with calls for restraint and expressions of concern. The Government of India stated that it would be “helpful” if the regime released Aung San Suu Kyi and advocated a broad-based and inclusive process of national reconciliation. However, India’s message and support for U.S. efforts in the United Nations is undercut by actions, such as its announcement to invest over $100 million in a transportation development project in western Burma, which is adjacent to recently explored offshore gas fields. India can and should do more given its stature as the world’s largest democracy; its voice and actions, at this time, are critical. -
State Dept. credits China with persuading SPDC to allow UN Special Advisor Gambari’s to meet with both Than Shwe and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (September 29 – October 2). Lauds China for supporting the UN Security Council’s October 11 Presidential Statement on Burma. Then says China can and must do more, i.e.: -
Support an early return visit by Special Advisor Gambari to Burma -
Influence the regime to release detainees and the initiate genuine dialogue with pro-democracy leaders and ethnic minority representatives. So, this is all well and good, but... no word on Chevron? |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 31 October 2007 )
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 14 of 15 |